OPINION — “The {Senate Appropriations] Committee recommends will increase for [fiscal 2026 Defense Department (DoD)] packages and initiatives which might be oriented to addressing these rising threats and necessities shortfalls — together with, however not restricted to, munitions manufacturing, drone and counter-drone expertise, air and missile protection, improvement of next-generation weapons platforms, shipbuilding, safety cooperation with key allies and companions, and different priorities recognized in army service and combatant command unfunded priorities lists.”
That’s a part of the opening part of the Senate Appropriations Committee report on the fiscal 2026 Protection Appropriations Invoice, launched on July 31, after the laws handed the committee by an amazing, bipartisan, 26-to-3 vote.
The Committee’s suggestion of $852.5 billion is $21.7 billion above President Trump’s funds request. I’ll talk about particular objects beneath.
However first I need to say that I’ve not just lately learn a committee report masking broad protection points that so usually takes subject with Pentagon choices.
For instance, the Committee members complained about “the late and incomplete submission of the fiscal 12 months 2026 President’s funds request [which] materially impacted the power of Congress to supply for the Division of Protection’s said necessities.”
The Senators additionally questioned why “the Government Department divided the President’s funds request for the Division of Protection right into a discretionary request and a compulsory request,” saying that method “dangers creating pointless funding cliffs, misalignments, and uncertainties.”
In what could possibly be learn as a criticism of Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth, the report famous that “in some instances, the funds justification paperwork and briefings offered by the Division had been incomplete, insufficient, and inconsistent with long-standing practices and procedures.”
The truth is, the Committee report mentioned that for the reason that One Large Stunning Invoice (Reconciliation Act for funding fiscal 2025) was signed on July 4, the Committee has obtained a supplementary unfunded priorities checklist from the DoD totaling $9.5 billion figuring out vital shortfalls in main procurement packages that had been neither addressed below reconciliation nor had been included within the fiscal 12 months 2026 annual funds request. That quantity, plus different unfunded necessities requested by the person army companies and combatant instructions got here to a different $53.7 billion.
As recognized by the army departments and combatant instructions, the Committee then accredited over $20 billion from the companies’ unfunded necessities checklist in its model of the fiscal 2026 Protection Appropriations Invoice.
Want a every day dose of actuality on nationwide and international safety points? Subscriber to The Cipher Temporary’s Nightcap e-newsletter, delivering professional insights on at present’s occasions – proper to your inbox. Join free at present.
Whereas I talk about among the main add-ons made by the Senate Committee, I’m ignoring the funding modifications within the report for a lot of particular person weapon programs in addition to the annual including of medical research, the place Congress yearly usually asserts the needs of particular person members.
The largest add-on, some $8.6 billion, is for a number of features of Navy shipbuilding. The Committee claimed the DoD misaligned necessary and discretionary funding of some $11 billion between the fiscal 12 months 2026 President’s funds request and the One Large Stunning Invoice within the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy account.
The Committee report mentioned, “Whereas a few of these misalignments are addressed on this act, or could also be addressed in future acts, different misalignments might require further statutory modifications.”
The Committee additionally complained that the Navy “Shipbuilding and Conversion, justification guide was offered to the Committee solely on July 3, and that the Secretary of the Navy didn’t present funds briefings as requested on a number of shipbuilding packages together with Columbia-class and Virginia-class submarines, written program briefs for nearly half of the account, and in no instances the Future Years Protection Program profiles regardless of a [statutory] requirement to take action.”
The Committee additionally mentioned it “stays involved about continued delays and capability limitations in Navy shipbuilding, which have elevated at the same time as Congress has offered further funding for Navy to deal with shipbuilding industrial base and workforce challenges.”
The report added, “Extra successfully utilizing further shipyards and non-traditional suppliers is important to deal with these shortfalls,” and directed “the Secretary of the Navy, not later than 180 days after the enactment of this act, to submit a report back to the congressional protection committees detailing a plan to broaden using further shipyards and new, revolutionary suppliers.”
In one other class, the Committee mentioned it “stays involved that the fiscal 12 months 2026 President’s funds request doesn’t adequately prioritize or fund the growth of manufacturing capability for essential munitions.”
The Committee’s report famous that the Army Companies unfunded priorities lists requested “further funding for each munition amount buys and facilitization [manufacturing expansion] efforts, funding that ought to have been included within the discretionary base funds submission.”
In consequence the Committee added $5.2 billion to the fiscal 2026 funds for munitions and one other $2.1 billion for facilitization.
The Committee complained that DoD and the army companies “proceed to underfund the facilitization and tooling wanted to totally make the most of the protection industrial base. This shortfall highlights an ongoing disjunction between the DoD’s said necessities and its funds execution methods.”
In consequence, the Committee mentioned, “The DoD will probably be unable to climate pressing, emergent operational calls for, replenish expended stockpiles, and modernize essential munitions manufacturing strains in time-relevant methods. The Committee urges the Division to behave with the foresight and urgency required by the present menace surroundings, and to totally make the most of accessible manufacturing capability previous to a disaster.”
The Committee underscored “the DoD’s obligation to obviously outline munitions necessities, each for baseline stockpiles and surge capability, and to program ample funding accordingly.”
Subscriber+Members have unique entry to the Open Supply Assortment Each day Temporary, holding you updated on international occasions impacting nationwide safety. It pays to be a Subscriber+Member.
As for Ukraine, the Committee report welcomed DoD’s “curiosity in ‘Drone Dominance’ and shares the Secretary of the Military’s evaluation that Ukraine is a ‘Silicon Valley of warfare.’” It went on, “Because of this, the Committee recommends restoring funding to the long-standing Ukraine Safety Help Initiative,” the place the Trump administration had really helpful nothing.
The Committee added $800 million to the invoice for the Ukraine Safety Help Initiative and mentioned it “encourages the [Defense] Division to maintain a partnership with Ukraine’s armed forces, that are in some ways the world’s foremost specialists in drone warfare.”
Talking of drones, the Committee mentioned that requested funding has not enabled the Combatant Instructions to maintain tempo with the evolving abroad threats from drones, referred to as within the army counter-unmanned aerial programs [C–UAS].
Subsequently, the Committee really helpful a rise of $217 million above the President’s funds request for “layered C–UAS capabilities, together with fixed-site, cellular, and dismounted programs, in addition to rising applied sciences reminiscent of synthetic intelligence-enabled concentrating on, superior digital warfare, and directed vitality.” The Committee emphasised “that C–UAS programs are essential to base safety, significantly for ahead working areas and high-value mounted infrastructure.”
I discover one further merchandise value mentioning: The Committee mentioned it was “troubled by a proposed reduction-in-force concentrating on 75 p.c of the DOT&E [the Office of the Director, Operational Test and Evaluation] civilian workforce, particularly contemplating the Division’s investments within the ‘Golden Dome’ space-based ballistic missile protection system and the essential want for thorough testing of hypersonic weapons.”
The Committee identified that DOT&E “has authorized mandates to make sure the effectiveness and suitability of protection programs,” and the “growth of digital engineering fashions has created new, related frontiers for the take a look at and analysis ecosystem, presenting alternatives for leaders on the Division of Protection to have higher confidence within the high quality of end-items procured.”
Again in Could, Protection Secretary Hegseth introduced he had decreased the employees at DOT&E from 94 staff all the way down to 30 civilians and 15 service members as the results of a “complete inner evaluation” that recognized duplicative roles and positions within the workplace.
The Senate Committee report, nevertheless, added $3 million for DOT&E and stipulated it was “a congressional particular curiosity merchandise,” and directed “the Deputy Secretary of Protection, not later than 30 days after enactment of this act, to transient the congressional protection committees on how to make sure the continuity and satisfactory resourcing of missions traditionally carried out by the Director of Operational Take a look at and Analysis evaluation enabling fact-based assessments of proposed acquisitions.”
The Senate Committee model of the fiscal 2026 Protection Appropriations Invoice nonetheless should go the Senate after which be reconciled with the Home-passed model, which is $20 billion decrease and extra in keeping with the Trump administration request.
There will probably be modifications, however the Senate Committee has made some factors that should be handled.
The Cipher Temporary is dedicated to publishing a spread of views on nationwide safety points submitted by deeply skilled nationwide safety professionals.
Opinions expressed are these of the writer and don’t characterize the views or opinions of The Cipher Temporary.
Have a perspective to share primarily based in your expertise within the nationwide safety discipline? Ship it to Editor@thecipherbrief.com for publication consideration.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Temporary
