The latest clashes underscore a easy fact: kinetic escalation alongside a porous frontier is a multiplier. Airstrikes, artillery duels, and intermittent border closures do not stay native nuisances. They power displacement, interrupt commerce and humanitarian entry, and create openings for transnational violent actors to regroup and broaden. On the similar time, high-level diplomatic gestures, like India’s reception of a Taliban overseas minister—assist normalize engagement with out demanding verifiable commitments from Kabul on terrorism, human rights, or governance. The result’s a harmful two-track dynamic: escalation on the bottom and normalization within the capitals.
A short historical past of the rivalry on Afghan soil
Pakistan’s footprint in Afghanistan is outdated and deep. From the anti-Soviet jihad to the Nineteen Nineties civil warfare, Pakistan’s Inter-Providers Intelligence (ISI) cultivated proxies, educated fighters in madrassas and camps, and hosted Taliban decision-making our bodies in Quetta, Peshawar, and Miramshah. By the point I led Alerts Intelligence at NDS, the fabric flows, explosives, trainers, and fighters—have been a well-known sample. As U.S. forces drew down after 2014, Islamabad’s public posture shifted; in personal and in some diplomatic boards, Pakistan offered the Taliban as a political actuality to be accommodated. That lodging was at all times transactional, nonetheless, and it produced deep leverage inside Afghanistan—from provincial commanders to parts inside Kabul.
India’s engagement adopted a distinct logic however with equally transactional ends. Delhi invested closely in infrastructure, training and growth—roads, energy tasks, scholarships that despatched Afghans to Indian universities. These investments constructed goodwill and administrative capability. However India additionally positioned itself as a counterweight to Pakistan. New Delhi’s community of consulates, together with two on Pakistan’s border, supplied each soft-power attain and strategic perception. My colleagues and I at NDS have been conscious that New Delhi’s intelligence service (RAW) cultivated contacts in border provinces and maintained hyperlinks that may very well be used towards Pakistan. On the time the Afghan republic rationalized these partnerships: the enemy of our enemy was a helpful ally. That pragmatic logic blinded us to a harsher actuality—India’s assist for Afghan establishments was, in the end, calibrated to New Delhi’s aggressive wants, not an unconditional dedication to the Republic’s survival.
Two anecdotes illustrate the corrosive impact of exterior rivalry on Afghan sovereignty. First, whereas intercepting communications as head of Alerts Intelligence I as soon as heard Normal Dostum pleading on the telephone with Pakistan’s ambassador—an trade that exposed how rapidly even vocal opponents may search patronage. Second, a personal assembly with the RAW station chief in Kabul—held months earlier than the Republic collapsed—left me with a hole certainty: Indian intelligence was getting ready contingency plans for the Republic’s fall moderately than mobilizing to stop it. These weren’t betrayals born of malice however of strategic realism: each Delhi and Islamabad have been optimizing for their very own survival and leverage.
The Cipher Temporary brings expert-level context to nationwide and international safety tales. It’s by no means been extra vital to know what’s occurring on the earth. Improve your entry to unique content material by turning into a subscriber.
Why this rivalry issues now
Three options make the present second notably dangerous.
First, even when assaults originate with state-adjacent actors inside Afghanistan, their results are interstate: whether or not Islamabad acknowledges strikes in Kandahar or Taliban-aligned teams perform violence, the result’s cross-border hurt — civilians killed, infrastructure broken, and humanitarian entry disrupted.
Second, diplomatic gestures with out conditionality distort incentives. India’s public reset—receiving a Taliban overseas minister—grants political area to a motion whose inside insurance policies stay deeply repressive. If main regional powers normalize ties with out demanding verifiable modifications, they threat entrenching a governance mannequin that permits radicalization and denies primary rights, notably for girls and minorities.
Third, Afghans pay the value. Exterior competitors saps Afghan company. Political elites are incentivized to domesticate overseas patrons moderately than construct home coalitions. Former safety personnel, civil servants and susceptible communities are both deserted or turn into leverage for out of doors actors. The human value—displacement, lack of livelihoods, shrinking civic area—is the clearest metric of failure.
A 3-part coverage strategy: sovereignty, de-escalation, and conditional engagement
If Washington and its companions are critical about stability in South and Central Asia, they need to undertake a compact centered on three priorities.
Stop Afghanistan from turning into the battlefield. The U.S. ought to lead a regional safety initiative—slender in scope however backed by monitoring and consequence mechanisms—bringing collectively India, Pakistan, Iran, China, and key Central Asian states. The initiative would pledge non-use of Afghan territory for hostile proxy exercise, create neutral border monitoring mechanisms, and set up rapid-response channels to defuse incidents earlier than they spiral.
Push India and Pakistan again to bilateral dialogue. Probably the most sturdy method to take away Afghan soil from the rivalry is to cut back the rivalry itself. Washington ought to use calibrated incentives and diplomatic leverage to get Delhi and Islamabad into issue-specific talks—beginning with confidence-building measures on border administration, refugee dealing with, counter-narcotics cooperation, and a hotline for counterterrorism incidents. These are pragmatic, tradeable commitments that construct reciprocity with out demanding grand concessions.
Situation engagement with Kabul on verifiable benchmarks. Engagement with the de facto authorities will proceed for humanitarian and safety causes—nevertheless it should not reward predation. Bilateral ties ought to be tied to clear, public benchmarks: demonstrable counter-terrorism cooperation, protections for civilian populations (particularly girls and minorities), and steps to stop Afghan soil from being utilized by transnational violent actors. Parallel assist should be scaled for civil society, unbiased media, and the Afghan diaspora—networks that protect the political capital wanted for a future inclusive order.
Want a day by day dose of actuality on nationwide and international safety points? Subscriber to The Cipher Temporary’s Nightcap publication, delivering knowledgeable insights on at present’s occasions – proper to your inbox. Join free at present.
Realism with penalties
Some will argue that Delhi’s and Islamabad’s actions are pushed by existential fears and that exterior strain has restricted buy. That’s true. However realism additionally acknowledges that incentives, reputational prices, and monitoring can alter strategic calculations. The purpose is to not power idealism however to make proxy methods much less worthwhile—politically, economically and reputationally—than cooperation.
Conclusion
The latest ceasefire and high-profile diplomatic exercise are warnings greater than indicators of decision. Afghanistan’s sovereignty should not be handled as negotiable forex in a broader regional rivalry. If the worldwide neighborhood fails to behave, Afghans will proceed to undergo as their nation turns into the chessboard for others’ methods. The trail ahead is simple, if politically troublesome: stop kinetic escalation, push India and Pakistan towards sensible dialogue, and situation engagement with Kabul on measurable protections for Afghan individuals. For the sake of Afghanistan—and for regional safety—that’s the accountable, pragmatic alternative.
The Cipher Temporary is dedicated to publishing a variety of views on nationwide safety points submitted by deeply skilled nationwide safety professionals.
Opinions expressed are these of the writer and don’t signify the views or opinions of The Cipher Temporary.
Have a perspective to share primarily based in your expertise within the nationwide safety area? Ship it to Editor@thecipherbrief.com for publication consideration.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Temporary
