True crime documentaries and docuseries proceed to thrive, particularly on Netflix. Whereas the themes and subjects at hand could also be completely different, virtually all of those docs share a well-recognized method: there will probably be speaking head interviews lower in between each archival information footage and classy dramatic recreations of occasions. Most of the time, these recreations additionally comply with a well-recognized method: the faces of the actors portraying actual figures are often obscured, and their actions usually occur in gradual movement for further impact.
For those who’ve ever questioned why a lot true crime materials sticks to this acquainted method, the reply will be traced again to Errol Morris’ groundbreaking 1988 documentary “The Skinny Blue Line.” Morris’ movie adopted the story of Randall Dale Adams, a person convicted of murdering a Dallas police officer. Morris’ movie made it clear that Adams was harmless of the crime, and the documentary was so efficient it really helped result in Adams’ exoneration a 12 months after its launch.
Whereas “The Skinny Blue Line” is held in excessive regard nowadays, Morris’ film was really controversial when it first arrived. When Morris made “The Skinny Blue Line,” he selected to make use of trendy, dramatic recreations of sure of occasions, and whereas fashionable viewers have a tendency to consider this method as customary (and even cliche) within the true crime documentary style, on the time the movie was launched, such an method was extremely uncommon. Some critics even claimed that the movie did not rely as a “actual” documentary because it used so many recreations. And but, regardless of all of this, the movie’s repute solely elevated within the years since its launch, and its method to its materials turned extremely influential amongst different true crime doc filmmakers.
The Charles Manson story … with a twist
Due to the affect of “The Skinny Blue Line,” Morris will be seen as the daddy of the true crime documentary style — nearly each fashionable true crime doc is following his blueprint. Now, Morris is again with a model new true crime documentary, masking a subject that will probably be very acquainted to aficionados: the Manson Household murders.
However Morris’ new Netflix movie, “CHAOS: The Manson Murders,” is not telling the identical outdated acquainted story that was made so in style by Vincent Bugliosi and Curt Gentry’s ebook “Helter Skelter.” As a substitute, Morris is tackling materials lined Tom O’Neill and Dan Piepenbring’s ebook “CHAOS: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret Historical past of the Sixties,” which affords up a slightly stunning conspiracy principle that implies possibly, simply possibly, CIA thoughts management had one thing to do with the Manson murders.
Most individuals in all probability know the essential particulars of the Manson story. Within the Sixties, a brief, wannabe musician named Charles Manson gathered collectively a cult of principally feminine hippies to type a sort of commune in California. With hopes of beginning a race warfare, Manson despatched a few of his followers out over the course of two nights in August 1969 to commit a sequence of ugly murders, together with the homicide of pregnant actress Sharon Tate. Whereas Manson did not bodily commit any of those murders himself, he was seen because the ringleader of your entire scenario. Manson was finally sentenced to life in jail, and died in 2017 whereas nonetheless incarcerated.
Manson nonetheless looms massive over the popular culture panorama for varied causes. His household’s crimes, coming in 1969, signaled a sort of finish of the free love hippie period. The truth that the crimes additionally took the lifetime of a younger, lovely (and pregnant) actress additionally made them heavy fodder for media consumption, as did the sensationalized trial of Manson and his follows. The “Helter Skelter” ebook solely elevated this consideration, as have varied different books and films, together with Quentin Tarantino’s latest “As soon as Upon a Time in Hollywood,” which dared to supply an alternate historical past method by which Manson’s stab-happy disciples have been finally (and violently) defeated earlier than they may harm anybody.
Did CIA thoughts management have something to do with the Manson murders?
Regardless of a lot media and popular culture protection of the occasions surrounding Manson, a number of unanswered questions linger across the case. The most important query that tends to get requested many times is: “How?” How, precisely, did Charles Manson discuss a bunch of children into committing a sequence of horrific murders? The frequent consensus, together with amongst Manson’s relations themselves, is that Manson was someway capable of brainwash them. However once more, the query lingers: how?
In 1999, journalist Tom O’Neill was employed by Premiere journal to put in writing in regards to the Manson murders. O’Neill had three months to file the piece, however ultimately, he missed his deadline — and stored digging. The top results of O’Neill’s work was the sprawling ebook “CHAOS: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret Historical past of the Sixties.” I’ve learn it, an whereas I discovered it fascinating, I additionally should confess that it gave me a little bit of a headache. O’Neill’s ebook goes down some wild avenues and finally ends up feeling just like the printed phrase recreation of the well-known “Pepe Silvia” second from “It is All the time Sunny in Philadelphia.”
Within the ebook, O’Neill and co-writer Dan Piepenbring posit that there is a probability that the Manson murders had one thing to do with the CIA’s notorious MKUltra program. Whereas it sounds just like the stuff of pulp fiction, MKUltra was very actual: the CIA actually experimented with methods to regulate folks’s minds by way of medicine and different strategies. The “CHAOS” ebook tries to attach the dots by drawing in a determine named Dr. Louis “Jolly” West, a psychiatrist working for the CIA who was hanging out within the Haight-Ashbury space across the time Manson was lurking about, nonetheless assembling his household. The one drawback is that regardless of his greatest efforts, O’Neill was by no means capable of join Manson and West.
CHAOS is value watching even when it takes a slightly easy method
To be clear, O’Neill’s ebook by no means comes proper out and blatantly says one thing like, “Charles Manson was working with the CIA!” He is merely stating that Manson’s supposed brainwashing of his household, which concerned copious quantities of hallucinogenic medicine, bears a putting similarity to the work the CIA was doing with MKUltra. It may all be a coincidence. Or it might be one thing extra sinister.
Having learn the ebook, I used to be very curious to see how Morris would sort out the fabric of “CHAOS.” Disappointingly, Morris’ method is surprisingly easy. The filmmaker has labored with Netflix earlier than on the underseen and slightly sensible “Wormwood,” a miniseries that blended documentary and fiction. That work felt actually groundbreaking (and, like “CHAOS,” additionally targeted on potential CIA thoughts management components), whereas “CHAOS” is kind of a regular true crime doc laying out the case. Morris appears extra eager about presenting the timeline of occasions slightly than going too deep into the weeds of the thoughts management stuff, and it is fairly clear from the get-go that the filmmaker does not purchase into any of it.
“Do I consider that Manson was programmed by MKUltra, by the federal government – a Manchurian candidate programmed to kill?” the filmmaker stated to The Guardian. “Not fairly. Can it’s confirmed? I do not suppose so. However can it’s disproven? I do not suppose it may be. One can present the requisite scepticism.”
Whereas I want Morris had been a bit of extra formally daring with this documentary, “CHAOS” nonetheless makes for a charming watch that may go away you with various uneasy questions.
“CHAOS: The Manson Murders” is streaming on Netflix on March seventh, 2025.
