EXPERT PERSPECTIVE — In recent times, the nationwide dialog about disinformation has typically targeted on bot networks, international operatives, and algorithmic manipulation at industrial scale. These issues are legitimate, and I spent years inside CIA finding out them with a stage of urgency that matched the stakes. However an equally essential story is taking part in out on the human stage. It’s a narrative that requires us to look extra carefully at how our personal instincts, feelings, and digital habits form the unfold of knowledge.
This story reveals one thing each sobering and empowering: falsehood strikes sooner than reality not merely due to the applied sciences that transmit it, however due to the psychology that receives it. That perception is now not simply the instinct of intelligence officers or behavioral scientists. It’s backed by onerous information.
In 2018, MIT researchers Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral revealed a groundbreaking examine in Science titled The Unfold of True and False Information On-line. It stays probably the most complete analyses ever carried out on how info travels throughout social platforms.
The crew examined greater than 126,000 tales shared by 3 million folks over a ten-year interval. Their findings have been putting. False information traveled farther, sooner, and extra deeply than true information. In lots of instances, falsehood reached its first 1,500 viewers six occasions sooner than factual reporting. Essentially the most viral false tales routinely reached between 1,000 and 100,000 folks, whereas true tales hardly ever exceeded a thousand.
Some of the essential revelations was that people, not bots, drove the distinction. Folks have been extra prone to share false information as a result of the content material felt contemporary, shocking, emotionally charged, or identity-affirming in ways in which factual information typically doesn’t. That human tendency is changing into a nationwide safety concern.
For years, psychologists have studied how novelty, emotion, and identification form what we take note of and what we select to share. The MIT researchers echoed this of their work, however a broader physique of analysis throughout behavioral science reinforces the purpose.
Folks gravitate towards what feels surprising. Novel info captures our consideration extra successfully than acquainted information, which implies sensational or fabricated claims typically win the primary click on.
Emotion provides a strong accelerant. A 2017 examine revealed within the Proceedings of the Nationwide Academy of Sciences confirmed that messages evoking robust ethical outrage journey by way of social networks extra quickly than impartial content material. Concern, disgust, anger, and shock create a way of urgency and a sense that one thing should be shared rapidly.
And identification performs a refined, however vital function. Sharing one thing provocative can sign that we’re properly knowledgeable, significantly vigilant, or aligned with our neighborhood’s worldview. This makes falsehoods that flatter identification or affirm preexisting fears significantly highly effective.
Taken collectively, these forces kind what some have known as the “human algorithm,” that means a set of cognitive patterns that adversaries have discovered to exploit with rising sophistication.
Save your digital seat now for The Cyber Initiatives Group Winter Summit on December 10 from 12p – 3p ET for extra conversations on cyber, AI and the way forward for nationwide safety.
Throughout my years main digital innovation at CIA, we noticed adversaries increase their technique past penetrating networks to manipulating the folks on these networks. They studied our consideration patterns as carefully as they as soon as studied our perimeter defenses.
International intelligence providers and digital affect operators discovered to seed narratives that evoke outrage, stoke division, or create the notion of insider data. They understood that emotion may outpace verification, and that pace alone may make a falsehood really feel plausible by way of sheer familiarity.
Within the present panorama, AI makes all of this simpler and sooner. Deepfake video, artificial personas, and automatic content material era enable small groups to supply massive volumes of emotionally charged materials at unprecedented scale. Current assessments from Microsoft’s 2025 Digital Protection Report doc how adversarial state actors (together with China, Russia, and Iran) now rely closely on AI-assisted affect operations designed to deepen polarization, erode belief, and destabilize public confidence within the U.S.
This tactic doesn’t require the viewers to imagine a false story. Usually, it merely goals to depart them not sure of what reality appears to be like like. And that uncertainty itself is a strategic vulnerability.
If misguided feelings can speed up falsehood, then a considerate and well-organized response will help guarantee factual info arrives with larger readability and pace.
One method includes rising what communication researchers generally name reality velocity, the act of getting correct info into public circulation rapidly, by way of trusted voices, and with language that resonates somewhat than lectures. This doesn’t imply replicating the manipulative emotional triggers that gasoline disinformation. It means delivering reality in ways in which really feel human, well timed, and related.
One other method includes small, sensible interventions that cut back the impulse to share doubtful content material with out pondering. Analysis by Gordon Pennycook and David Rand has proven that transient accuracy prompts (small moments that ask customers to think about whether or not a headline appears true) meaningfully cut back the unfold of false content material. Equally, cognitive scientist Stephan Lewandowsky has demonstrated the worth of clear context, cautious labeling, and easy corrections to counter the highly effective pull of emotionally charged misinformation.
Join the Cyber Initiatives Group Sunday e-newsletter, delivering expert-level insights on the cyber and tech tales of the day – on to your inbox. Join the CIG e-newsletter as we speak.
Organizations can even assist their groups perceive how cognitive blind spots affect their perceptions. When folks understand how novelty, emotion, and identification form their reactions, they change into much less prone to tales crafted to use these instincts. And when leaders encourage a tradition of considerate engagement the place colleagues pause earlier than sharing, examine the supply, and spot when a narrative appears designed to impress, it creates a ripple impact of extra sound judgment.
In an surroundings the place info strikes at pace, even a quick second of reflection can sluggish the unfold of a harmful narrative.
A core a part of this problem includes reclaiming the psychological house the place discernment occurs, what I seek advice from as Thoughts Sovereignty™. This idea is rooted in a easy apply: discover when a chunk of knowledge is making an attempt to impress an emotional response, and provides your self a second to judge it as a substitute.
Thoughts Sovereignty™ is just not about retreating from the world or changing into disengaged. It’s about navigating a loud info ecosystem with readability and steadiness, even when that ecosystem is designed to drag us off steadiness. It’s about defending our potential to assume clearly earlier than emotion rushes forward of proof.
This interior steadiness, in some methods, turns into a public good. It strengthens not simply people, however the communities, organizations, and democratic methods they inhabit.
Within the intelligence world, I at all times thought that reality was resilient, nevertheless it can’t defend itself. It depends on leaders, communicators, technologists, and extra broadly, all of us, who select to deal with info with care and intention. Falsehood could benefit from the benefit of pace, however reality good points energy by way of the standard of the minds that carry it.
As we develop new applied sciences and confront new threats, one query issues greater than ever: how can we strengthen the human algorithm in order that reality has a combating likelihood?
All statements of truth, opinion, or evaluation expressed are these of the writer and don’t mirror the official positions or views of the U.S. Authorities. Nothing within the contents must be construed as asserting or implying U.S. Authorities authentication of knowledge or endorsement of the writer’s views.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Temporary, as a result of Nationwide Safety is Everybody’s Enterprise.
